Profile of generation Z characteristics: Implications for contemporary educational approaches


  • Majid Wajdi Politeknik Negeri Bali, Indonesia
  • Budi Susanto Politeknik Negeri Bali, Indonesia
  • M. Agus Sutiarso Institut Pariwisata dan Bisnis Internasional Bali, Indonesia
  • Wisman Hadi Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia


characteristic of generation z, contemporary education, digital orientation, generation z, pedagogical implications


Generation Z, comprised of individuals born between the late 1990s and early 2010s, has become a subject of interest in discussions on social, cultural, and educational trends. Technological advancements and changes in social dynamics have significantly influenced the characteristics of this generation. This research aims to provide an in-depth understanding of Generation Z characteristics and explore how these traits can shape contemporary educational approaches. Thus, the study seeks to offer new insights to educators, curriculum planners, and educational policymakers. The research method involves a document study. It involves a document review conducted to detail the historical, social, and technological contexts that have shaped the identity of Generation Z. Data analysis reveals that Generation Z tends to have a digital orientation, engage in multitasking, exhibit high levels of creativity, and embrace inclusive values. They also demonstrate a significant interest in social engagement and environmental concerns. The implications of these findings on education highlight the need for responsive and innovative approaches to optimize the learning process. By understanding the characteristics of Generation Z, educators can design more effective and relevant teaching strategies. Educational approaches that focus on technology, engaging learning experiences, and the promotion of inclusive values can enhance the effectiveness of learning. Additionally, educators need to be aware that continuous adaptation to technological developments and social changes is key to creating a dynamic educational environment that aligns with the needs of Generation Z. The pedagogical implications of this research can serve as a foundation for curriculum development, teacher training, and educational policies that better align with the unique characteristics of Generation Z.


Anh, P. T. C., Huong, L. M., & Oanh, V. T. K. (2020). Generation Z willingness to pay for sustainable apparel: the influence of labelling for origin and eco-friendly material. Journal of International Economics and Management, 20(3), 42–59.

Anwar, T. M. (2019). Phenomenology of Communication of Generation Z in Pekanbaru. Komunikator, 11(1).

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

Balázsné, M., kovács, I., Balázs, B. F., & Beke, J. (2022). Health and Environment Conscious Consumer Attitudes:Generation Z Segment Personas According to the LOHAS Model. Social Sciences, 11(7).

Beregovskaya, T. A., & Grishaeva, S. A. (2020). Generation Z: Consumer Behavior in Digital Ecosystem. Vestnik Universiteta, 1, 92–99.

Budiman, C., Tanjaya, K., Zulkarnain, A., & Rosman, D. (2023). The effect of paylater on purchase decision and continuance intention in generation Z at GoFood application. E3S Web of Conferences, 426.

Coman, I. A., Yuan, S., & Tsai, J. Y. (2022). Toward an Audience-Centric Framework of Corporate Social Advocacy Strategy: An Exploratory Study of Young Consumers from Generation Z. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7).

Côté, J., & Gilbert, W. (2009). An Integrative Definition of Coaching Effectiveness and Expertise. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(3), 307–323.

Dessy Mutiara Cipta, & Silvanus Alvin. (2023). Communication Privacy Management Among Gen-Z Influencers: Exploring the Instagram Ngl Feature and Illusion of Social Closeness. International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 3(5), 1546–1554.

Dimitrov, K. (2023). The impact of work motivation on job satisfaction with mediating effect of key work behaviour variables: A Bulgarian case of Generation Z employees. SHS Web of Conferences, 176, 04002.

Dobre, C., Milovan, A. M., Duțu, C., Preda, G., & Agapie, A. (2021). The common values of social media marketing and luxury brands. The millennials and generation z perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 2532–2553.

Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s generation Z. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3), 250–252.

Evsegneeva, N. S. (2022). Generation Z and its heroes. Vestnik Universiteta, 2, 183–187.

Handayani, I. (2019). Konsep Bimbingan dan Konseling Pribadi-Sosial dalam Pengembangan Positive Mental Attitude Generasi Z. NALAR: Jurnal Peradaban Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 51–63.

Hauser, L. (2019). Flexibilisation at the Workplace and its Impact on Leadership Methods in Germany / Leadership for the Generation Z. Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, I(1), 137–146.

Kaban, A. F., Triyanto, F., & Prabowo, I. C. (2023). The success factors of e-Filing implementation for Gen Z individual taxpayers in Indonesia: Based on the DeLone & McLean IS Success Model. E3S Web of Conferences, 426, 1–8.

Kangwa, D., Mwale, J. T., & Shaikh, J. M. (2021). The social production of financial inclusion of generation Z in digital banking ecosystems. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 15(3), 95–118.

Kraidenkov, Y., & Sviridova, L. (2021). Management of generation Z staff in the digital economy. SHS Web of Conferences, 116, 00015.

Mansur, A., & Ridwan, R. (2022). Karakteristik Siswa Generasi Z dan Kebutuhan Akan Pengembangan Bidang Bimbingan dan Konseling. Educatio, 17(1), 120–130.

Mendoza, A. L., Hernández, R. V. R., Quezada, M. T. P., & Hernández, R. S. (2023). Cybersecurity among University Students from Generation Z: A Comparative Study of the Undergraduate Programs in Administration and Public Accounting in two Mexican Universities. TEM Journal, 12(1), 503–511.

Nordin, H., Singh, D., Mansor, Z., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2022). Impact of Power Distance Cultural Dimension in E-Learning Interface Design Among Malaysian Generation Z Students. IEEE Access, 10, 64199–64208.

Renaldo, N., Sudarno, S., & Marice, H. B. (2020). the Improvement of Generation Z Financial Well-Being in Pekanbaru. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 22(2), 142–151.

Rosida, R. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Pembelian Kosmetik Halal. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam (Journal of Islamic Economics and Business), 4(2), 129.

Setko, A. G., Bulycheva, E. V., & Setko, N. P. (2019). Peculiarities of prenosological changes in mental and physical health of students from generation Z. Health Risk Analysis, 7(4), 158–164.

Shetu, S. N. (2023). Do user ‑ generated content and micro ‑ celebrity posts encourage generation Z users to search online shopping behavior on social networking sites — the moderating role of sponsored ads. Future Business Journal.

Tănase, M. O., Nistoreanu, P., Dina, R., Georgescu, B., Nicula, V., & Mirea, C. N. (2023). Generation Z Romanian Students’ Relation with Rural Tourism—An Exploratory Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10), 1–21.

Twenge, J. M. (2019). More Time on Technology, Less Happiness? Associations Between Digital-Media Use and Psychological Well-Being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 372–379.

Yunitasari, E., & Parahiyanti, C. R. (2022). Investigating the Effect of Consumer Ethnocentrism, Cosmopolitanism, and Relative Product Quality to Brand Preferences: An Insight from Generation Z in Indonesia. Binus Business Review, 13(3), 259–272.

Zhang, X., & Chang, M. (2023). Applying the Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Taiwan’s Generation Z’s Behavioral Intentions toward Using Electric Motorcycles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4).



2024-02-01 — Updated on 2024-03-15


How to Cite

Wajdi, M., Susanto, B., Sutiarso, M. A., & Hadi, W. (2024). Profile of generation Z characteristics: Implications for contemporary educational approaches. Kajian Pendidikan, Seni, Budaya, Sosial & Lingkungan, 1(1), 33–44. Retrieved from (Original work published February 1, 2024)