Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
The publication process at Kajian Pendidikan, Seni, Budaya, Sosial dan Lingkungan - Studies of Education, Arts, Culture, Social and Environment adheres to rigorous peer review standards to ensure the quality, originality, and academic integrity of all submitted manuscripts.
1. Submission Review
Upon submission, the editorial team performs an initial screening to ensure that the manuscript aligns with the journal’s scope, adheres to submission guidelines, and meets basic quality standards.
2. Double-Blind Peer Review
All eligible manuscripts are subjected to a double-blind peer review process, where:
- The reviewers do not know the identities of the authors.
- The authors do not know the identities of the reviewers.
This process ensures impartiality and unbiased evaluation of the manuscript.
3. Reviewer Selection
The editorial team selects reviewers based on their expertise in the relevant field. Each manuscript is typically reviewed by two to three independent experts.
4. Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers assess the manuscript based on the following criteria:
- Relevance to the journal’s scope.
- Originality and contribution to the field.
- Methodological rigor and accuracy.
- Clarity of presentation and logical coherence.
- Validity of findings and conclusions.
5. Feedback and Revisions
Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations (accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject). Authors are required to revise the manuscript based on reviewer comments and resubmit for further evaluation if necessary.
6. Editorial Decision
The editorial team makes the final decision regarding publication based on reviewer feedback and the quality of the revised manuscript. Possible outcomes include acceptance, conditional acceptance with further revisions, or rejection.
7. Publication
Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting and formatting before publication. Authors are provided with proofs for final approval prior to publication.
Reviewer Integrity
The journal ensures confidentiality and ethical practices throughout the review process. Reviewers are expected to disclose conflicts of interest and maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript’s content.
For more details on the peer review process, please visit [Insert Journal Website Link].